Mikromarc websearch

*00000886nam a22002777a 4500
*00140697
*00520160920112037.5
*008080204s2007    xxka          000 0 eng c
*020  $a978-0-470-06637-9
*035  $a(SE-LIBR)10670690
*035  $a(Ko)47960
*040  $aLaib
*084  $aIct$2kssb/8
*084  $aOdgd$2kssb/8
*24510$aCities of dispersal /$cguest-edited by Rafi Segal and Els Verbakel
*260  $aChichester :$bWiley,$c2008
*300  $a135 s. :$bill. (huvudsakligen i färg)
*440  $aArchitectural design profile,$x99-0505112-0 ;$v191
*500  $aPublished as part of: Architectural design ; Vol. 78 (2008):1
*650 7$aStadsförnyelse$2sao$0https://id.kb.se/term/sao/Stadsf%C3%B6rnyelse
*650 7$aStadsplanering$2sao
*650 0$aCity planning
*650 0$aUrban renewal
*7001 $aSegal, Rafi K.$4edt
*7001 $aVerbakel, Els$4edt
*7600 $tArchitectural design.$g2008$w47318
*852  $5Ko$bKo$hTIDSKRIFTER - Architectural design$lCIT
^

Questioning the traditional boundaries between cities, suburbs, countryside and wilderness, this issue of AD explores emergent types of public space in low-density environments. It describes this new form of urbanism: decentralised, in a constant process of expansion and contraction, not homogenous or necessarily low-rise, nor guided by one mode of development, typology or pattern.

While functionally and programmatically dispersed, settlements operate as a form of urbanism; the place of collective spaces within them has yet to be defined and articulated. The physical transformation of the built environment on the one hand, and the change in our notion of the public on the other - due to globalisation, privatisation and segregation - call for renewed interpretations of the nature and character of public space. The concept of public space needs to be examined: replaced, re-created or adapted to fit these conditions. What is the place of the public in this form of urbanism, and how can architecture address the notion of common, collective spaces? What is the current sociopolitical role o such spaces? How does the form and use of these spaces reflect the conception of the public as a political (or non-political) body? And can architecture regain an active role in formulating the notion of the collective? These and other issues are addressed through essays, research projects and built work by distinguished writers such as Bruce Robbins, Albert Pope and Alex Wall, and Practitioners including Zvi Hecker, Vito Acconci, MUTOPIA, Manuel de Sola-Morales, Martha Rosler and Manuel Vicente in a search for new collective architectures within the dispersed city.

• Editorial
• Introduction: Urbanism Without Density
• The Public and the V2
• Terminal Distribution
• Public Lifestyle in the Low-Density City
• Old Dispersion and Scenes fro the Production of Public Space The Constructive Margins of Secondarity
• Walter and Asphalt The Project of Isotropy in the Metropolitan Region of Venice
• Intermittent Cities On Waiting Spaces and How to Inhabit Transforming Cities
• String Block Vs. Superblock Patterns of Dispersal in Chain
• In Our Beautiful Future
• Archipelago of the Negev Dessert A Temporal/Collective Plan for Beer Sheva, Israel
• Peripheral Landscapes, El Caracol, Mexico City
• Urban Voids: Grounds for Change
• Reimagining Philadelphia's Vacant Lands
• Urban [IM]plants
• Tactics for Recombining Landscape and Collective Space in Bonheiden, Belgium
• User-Focused Public Space (m)Utopia in Denmark
• Royal Dutch Military Police Campus
• Zvi Hecker's Landscape Urbanism
• Ville-Port, Saint-Nazaire
• The Historic Periphery
• Nam Van Square, Macau
• Mur Island, Graz, Austria
• Discussion Architecture and Dispersal
• Interior Eye Reinvigorating Childhood
• Practice Profile Kieran Timberlake Associates
• Userscape Natural Methods of Interaction Or Natural Interaction in the Everyday Digital World
• Spiller's Bits Putting the 'I' back into Architecture
• Unit Factor Radical Interface AA New Media Research Initiative
• Yeang's Eco-Files
• On Green Design (Part 3) The Basic Premises for Green Design
• McLean's Nuggets