Mikromarc websearch

*00002085nam a22006017a 4500
*00137740
*00520130423065351.3
*008111121s2012    nyu      b    001 0 eng c
*010  $a2011047620
*020  $a978-0-231-15292-1 (cloth : alk. paper)
*020  $a978-0-231-52678-4 (e-book)
*035  $a(SE-LIBR)12568753
*035  $a(Ko)42327
*040  $aDLC$beng$cDLC$dCaOONL$erda$dS
*042  $apcc
*05000$aN66$b.K42 2012
*08200$a111/.85$223
*084  $aDf$2kssb/8 (machine generated)
*1001 $aKelly, Michael,$d1954-
*24512$aA hunger for aesthetics :$benacting the demands of art /$cMichael Kelly.
*260  $aNew York :$bColumbia University Press,$c2012
*300  $axxii, 242 p. :$bill.
*336  $atext$2rdacontent
*337  $aunmediated$2rdamedia
*338  $avolume$2rdacarrier
*4900 $aColumbia themes in philosophy, social criticism, and the arts
*504  $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
*5050 $aIntroduction : the Dewey effect -- The Pop effect -- The Sontag effect -- The Richter effect -- The Salcedo effect.
*599  $aDawson
*650 0$aAesthetics.
*650 7$aEstetik$2sao$0https://id.kb.se/term/sao/Estetik
*650 0$aAesthetics
*841  $5Ko$ax aa$b130409||0000|||||000||||||000000$en
*852  $5Ko$bKo$hKONST - Iaa
*950  $aSkönhet$uEstetik
*950  $aAvantgarde (estetik)$wh$uEstetik
*950  $aDet pittoreska$wh$uEstetik
*950  $aFilmestetik$wh$uEstetik
*950  $aForm (estetik)$wh$uEstetik
*950  $aFulhet$wh$uEstetik
*950  $aKonstestetik$wh$uEstetik
*950  $aKonst och litteratur$wh$uEstetik
*950  $aLitteraturestetik$wh$uEstetik
*950  $aOriginalitet (estetik)$wh$uEstetik
*950  $aTeaterestetik$wh$uEstetik
*950  $aVulgaritet$wh$uEstetik
*950  $aCamp$wh$uEstetik
*950  $aPraktisk filosofi$uEstetik
*950  $aArkitekturestetik$wh$uEstetik
*950  $aKlassicism (litteratur)$wh$uEstetik
*950  $aSymmetri$wh$uEstetik
*950  $aKvinnlig skönhet$uEstetik
^

For decades, aesthetics has been subjected to a variety of critiques, often concerning its treatment of beauty or the autonomy of art. Collectively, these complaints have generated an anti-aesthetic stance prevalent in the contemporary art world. Yet if we examine the motivations for these critiques, Michael Kelly argues, we find theorists and artists hungering for a new kind of aesthetics, one better calibrated to contemporary art and its moral and political demands.

Following an analysis of the work of Stanley Cavell, Arthur Danto, Umberto Eco, Susan Sontag, and other philosophers of the 1960s who made aesthetics more responsive to contemporary art, Kelly considers Sontag's aesthetics in greater detail. In On Photography (1977), she argues that a photograph of a person who is suffering only aestheticizes the suffering for the viewer's pleasure, yet she insists in Regarding the Pain of Others (2003) that such a photograph can have a sustainable moral-political effect precisely because of its aesthetics. Kelly considers this dramatic change to be symptomatic of a cultural shift in our understanding of aesthetics, ethics, and politics. He discusses these issues in connection with Gerhard Richter's and Doris Salcedo's art, chosen because it is often identified with the anti-aesthetic, even though it is clearly aesthetic. Focusing first on Richter's Baader-Meinhof series, Kelly concludes with Salcedo's enactments of suffering caused by social injustice. Throughout A Hunger for Aesthetics , he reveals the place of critique in contemporary art, which, if we understand aesthetics as critique, confirms that it is integral to art. Meeting the demand for aesthetics voiced by many who participate in art, Kelly advocates for a critical aesthetics that confirms the power of art.

• List of Illustrationsp. xi
• Prefacep. xiii
• Acknowledgmentsp. xxi
• Introduction The Dewey Effectp. 1
• The Pop Effectp. 25
• The Sontag Effectp. 56
• The Richter Effectp. 84
• The Salcedo Effectp. 129
• Notesp. 175
• Indexp. 225